[RFC][PATCH] Replace the goto-based loop by a do-while statement

[Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@gmail.com>]

Hi list,

It looks like using the goto statement in constructs like

restart:
	// DO SOMETHING
if (condition)
	goto restart;

should be frowned upon and the loop

do {
	// DO SOMETHING
} while (condition);

is more appropriate in such situation.

However, in the __do_softirq() routine located in `kernel/softirq.c' the goto construct was chosen in favor of the do-while loop.

The patch included below replaces the goto-based loop by the do-while statement.

If the goto is really necessary here, I would be very grateful if someone could explain why.

Signed-off-by: Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@gmail.com>
--
diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index bd89bc4..b0d0431 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -219,28 +219,28 @@ asmlinkage void __do_softirq(void)
	trace_softirq_enter();

	cpu = smp_processor_id();
-restart:
-	/* Reset the pending bitmask before enabling irqs */
-	set_softirq_pending(0);

-	local_irq_enable();
+	do {
+		/* Reset the pending bitmask before enabling irqs */
+		set_softirq_pending(0);

-	h = softirq_vec;
+		local_irq_enable();

-	do {
-		if (pending & 1) {
-			h->action(h);
-			rcu_bh_qsctr_inc(cpu);
-		}
-		h++;
-		pending >>= 1;
-	} while (pending);
+		h = softirq_vec;

-	local_irq_disable();
+		do {
+			if (pending & 1) {
+				h->action(h);
+				rcu_bh_qsctr_inc(cpu);
+			}
+			h++;
+			pending >>= 1;
+		} while (pending);

-	pending = local_softirq_pending();
-	if (pending && --max_restart)
-		goto restart;
+		local_irq_disable();
+
+		pending = local_softirq_pending();
+	} while (pending && --max_restart);

	if (pending)
		wakeup_softirqd();
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/