On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 07:48:45AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 09:45 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > Well, I suppose the patch could go in, maybe with some ifdef's
> > around
> > > the bits in _switch_to, there's little point in doing that on non-rt
> > > kernels.
> >
> > As Nick Piggin already stated, and I'll even state it for the RT
> > kernel,
> > we do not allow preemption in switch_to. So it is safe to remove those
> > "preempt_disable" bits from the patch
>
> Sure, I know that, I'm not talking about that, I'm talking about the
> added code that flush pending batches & save the batch state, since on
> non-rt kernel, this is not useful (the batch is only ever active within
> a spinlocked section, which cannot be preempted on non-rt).
Ah, I need a bit of conditional compilation. Will fix.
Thanx, Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
