On Sun, 11 Nov 2007, Russell King wrote: > > So what's happening with this? Who's going to merge it? Well, I already removed the bogus file. But whether the defconfig file in arch/arm needs updating or not is up to you guys. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- ARM defconfig bogosity in current git
- From: Paul Mundt <[email protected]>
- Re: ARM defconfig bogosity in current git
- From: Russell King <[email protected]>
- Re: ARM defconfig bogosity in current git
- From: Robert Schwebel <[email protected]>
- Re: ARM defconfig bogosity in current git
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: ARM defconfig bogosity in current git
- From: Robert Schwebel <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] netx: remove bogus defconfig patch with wrong -p
- From: Robert Schwebel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] netx: remove bogus defconfig patch with wrong -p
- From: Russell King <[email protected]>
- ARM defconfig bogosity in current git
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] kernel/capability.c get_task_comm compile error (MMOTM)
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 24/24] make vsmp a paravirt client
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] netx: remove bogus defconfig patch with wrong -p
- Next by thread: [PATCH] 2.6.24-rc2-git1 Build fails in selinux/hooks.
- Index(es):
 |