On 09.11.2007 22:08, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>> And on the topic of "broken" BIOSes. I have a little empathy for the MB
>> manufactures as non-RAID AHCI royaly screws Windos, so not supporting it
>> reduces their support costs enough to overlook screwing the non-windos
>> faction.
>
> non-RAID AHCI works just fine on Windows.
Last i know is that Intel doesn't provide an AHCI driver for the
non-RAID version. (For whatever political reason). That is even
documented in the german "c't", they even had an articel about "patching
in the Device-IDs" so the RAID-AHCI driver accepts the non-RAID AHCI
chipsets.
And i can second that, when i configure my @home MB (ASUS P5B = non-RAID)
to AHCI neither XP nor Vista work.
@work i tried to install Vista on an AHCI-configured machine and aborted
that "expriment" after about 2 hours. In IDE-mode it took Vista about 3
Minutes to reach the point where i aborted the AHCI experiment.
So i must say: My milage varies.
Bis denn
--
Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as
bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer
wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated,
cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]