Matthew Garrett wrote:
Experience suggests that the _GTF method may be bad. We currently fail device revalidation in that case, which seems excessive.Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
applied - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- libata: cdrw/dvdrom disabed after s2ram (2.6.24-rc2)
- From: Roberto Oppedisano <[email protected]>
- Re: libata: cdrw/dvdrom disabed after s2ram (2.6.24-rc2)
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: libata: cdrw/dvdrom disabed after s2ram (2.6.24-rc2)
- From: Roberto Oppedisano <[email protected]>
- Re: libata: cdrw/dvdrom disabed after s2ram (2.6.24-rc2)
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: libata: cdrw/dvdrom disabed after s2ram (2.6.24-rc2)
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: libata: cdrw/dvdrom disabed after s2ram (2.6.24-rc2)
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: libata: cdrw/dvdrom disabed after s2ram (2.6.24-rc2)
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Don't fail ata device revalidation for bad _GTF methods
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- libata: cdrw/dvdrom disabed after s2ram (2.6.24-rc2)
- Prev by Date: [patch 2/2] fs: buffer trylock rename
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 1/2] mm: page trylock rename
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Don't fail ata device revalidation for bad _GTF methods
- Next by thread: Re: libata: cdrw/dvdrom disabed after s2ram (2.6.24-rc2)
- Index(es):
 |