-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Chris Friesen wrote:
>> A possible remedy is to return the ticks since process start time, which
>> delays the wrap around much further. POSIX only demands consistency
>> within the same process.
>
> This would be an interesting solution.
>
> The man page for linux states that the return code is time since system
> boot, so that could realistically be expected to correlate between
> different processes.
The Linux man page is documenting existing functionality on top of what
the standard requires. Programmers should ever only require what the
standard guarantees.
I am perfectly willing to support a solution where the time is measured
from process startup time. The only code using times() I found is
cross-platform and most likely does not depend on the value returned is
usable in isolation (only in a difference).
- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHNKTZ2ijCOnn/RHQRAv2wAJsHOnWRrbE2N2Z4R35bsU1+BIZEGQCguaxL
zY9f4XEhJnAoNF5jFxm76qI=
=0nsU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]