Re: [PATCH] sched: avoid large irq-latencies in smp-balancing

On Thursday 08 November 2007 15:37, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Bah, missed a hunk
> >
> > ---
> > Subject: sched: avoid large irq-latencies in smp-balancing
> >
> > SMP balancing is done with IRQs disabled and can iterate the full rq.
> > When rqs are large this can cause large irq-latencies. Limit the nr of
> > iterations on each run.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
> > CC: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
>
> Tested-by: Gregory Haskins <[email protected]> (as part of 23.1-rt11)

OK, but let's not make this default for mainline just yet please. There
are so many performance regression possibilities in 2.6.24 already that
we should go a little bit slower for now IMO.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] sched: avoid large irq-latencies in smp-balancing
  - From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: avoid large irq-latencies in smp-balancing
  - From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: avoid large irq-latencies in smp-balancing
  - From: Gregory Haskins <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Add quirk to set AHCI mode on ICH boards
Next by Date: [PATCH] ehea: Add kdump support
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: avoid large irq-latencies in smp-balancing
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: avoid large irq-latencies in smp-balancing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]