On 09/11/2007, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]> wrote:
> [ ... ]
>
> As a solution to this problem, I moved sched_fork() call, which
> initializes scheduler related fields on a new task, before
> copy_namespaces(). I am not sure though whether moving up will
> cause other side-effects. Do you see any issue?
Should be ok (IMHO and at first glance :-)
> - The second problem exposed by this test is that task_new_fair()
> assumes that parent and child will be part of the same group (which
> needn't be as this test shows). As a result, cfs_rq->curr can be NULL
> for the child.
Would it be better, logically-wise, to use is_same_group() instead?
Although, we can't have 2 groups with cfs_rq->curr != NULL on the same
CPU... so if the child belongs to another group, it's cfs_rq->curr is
automatically NULL indeed.
--
Best regards,
Dmitry Adamushko
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
