Re: [Lguest] [PATCH] virtio config_ops refactoring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dor Laor wrote:
ron minnich wrote:

Hi, I'm sorry, I've been stuck on other things (NFS RDMA anyone?) and
missed part of this discussion.

Is it really the case that operations on virtio devices will involve
outl/inl etc.?

What's the problem with them?
Except for the kick event it's not performance critical and the difference between pio vmexit
and hypercall exit is very small.

If you're a nutty guy who's interesting in creating the most absolute minimal VMM to run exotic paravirtual guests on massive clusters, then requiring PIO implies that you have to have an instruction decoder which is goes against the earlier goal ;-)

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

I don't know about problems in other architectures, maybe mmio is better?
Dor.


Apologies in advance for my failure to pay attention.

thanks

ron
_______________________________________________
Lguest mailing list
[email protected]
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/lguest



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux