On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 21:56:32 +0200 "Denys Fedoryshchenko" <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, it works like that. > > Seems in libata there is no fall-back to non-DMA mode, if DMA didn't work. It should be falling back from UDMA or MWDMA to PIO, if not please file a bug Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- SC1200 failure in 2.6.23 and 2.6.24-rc1-git10
- From: "Denys" <[email protected]>
- Re: SC1200 failure in 2.6.23 and 2.6.24-rc1-git10
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: SC1200 failure in 2.6.23 and 2.6.24-rc1-git10
- From: "Denys Fedoryshchenko" <[email protected]>
- Re: SC1200 failure in 2.6.23 and 2.6.24-rc1-git10
- From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[email protected]>
- Re: SC1200 failure in 2.6.23 and 2.6.24-rc1-git10
- From: "Denys Fedoryshchenko" <[email protected]>
- Re: SC1200 failure in 2.6.23 and 2.6.24-rc1-git10
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: SC1200 failure in 2.6.23 and 2.6.24-rc1-git10
- From: "Denys Fedoryshchenko" <[email protected]>
- Re: SC1200 failure in 2.6.23 and 2.6.24-rc1-git10
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: SC1200 failure in 2.6.23 and 2.6.24-rc1-git10
- From: "Denys Fedoryshchenko" <[email protected]>
- SC1200 failure in 2.6.23 and 2.6.24-rc1-git10
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/7] x86: clean up asm-x86/page*.h
- Next by Date: Re: [Lguest] [PATCH] virtio config_ops refactoring
- Previous by thread: Re: SC1200 failure in 2.6.23 and 2.6.24-rc1-git10
- Next by thread: Re: SC1200 failure in 2.6.23 and 2.6.24-rc1-git10
- Index(es):
 |