> On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 12:03:52 -0800 Mark Gross <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...
> > > call.
> > >
> > > I shouldn't have to have a process open a /dev/file, write a number, and then
> > > stay around forever so the file doesn't close in order to get the same behavior
> > > I was getting by default before. What needs to happen to get this to not
> > > be a behavior regression/change?
> > >
> >
> > That's a great report, thanks. Over to you, Mark ;)
> >
> > btw, I also have a note here that these patches caused Rafael to see an
> > smp_call_function() inside local_irq_save(). Did that get fixed?
>
> Ah, I see the problem. I think I posted a fix to this. The problem is
> that what's in the mm1 tree has a parameter PM_QOS_IDLE that needed to
> be PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY.
That doesn't ring a bell.
> I'm not sure what's in the current MM tree at this point so I can't say
> its been fixed. Is there an easy way from me to see what's currently in
> MM?
Not terribly.
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/mm/broken-out-2007-11-06-02-32.tar.gz
is from two days ago.
> FWIW I think I fixed this when I fixed up Rafael's issue. Would you
> like me to send out a re-fresh patch against 2.6.23-mm1?
sure.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
