> No, it wasn't, I diffed it against -rc1. I tested the Kconfig changes > with "make ARCH=x86_64 menuconfig" and "make ARCH=i386 menuconfig". As > far as I understand, the new x86 arch depends on being called as > ARCH=i386 or ARCH=x86_64. I may have misunderstood how the x86 > architecture works but hoped Rafael would know more and tell me if I was > wrong. ok, so Christoph Hellwig and others tell me "it's being worked on". Please ignore these patches, I'll send new ones once that architecture has worked out how it wants to work. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- Re: [PATCH (2.6.25) 0/2] suspend/hibernate Kconfig cleanups
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH (2.6.25) 0/2] suspend/hibernate Kconfig cleanups
- From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH (2.6.25) 0/2] suspend/hibernate Kconfig cleanups
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [PATCH (2.6.25) 1/2] hibernation: clean up Kconfig
- From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH (2.6.25) 1/2] hibernation: clean up Kconfig
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH (2.6.25) 1/2] hibernation: clean up Kconfig
- From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH (2.6.25) 0/2] suspend/hibernate Kconfig cleanups
- Prev by Date: Re: libata: cdrw/dvdrom disabed after s2ram (2.6.24-rc2)
- Next by Date: Re: libata: cdrw/dvdrom disabed after s2ram (2.6.24-rc2)
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH (2.6.25) 1/2] hibernation: clean up Kconfig
- Next by thread: [PATCH (2.6.25) 2/2] suspend: clean up Kconfig
- Index(es):