Re: [RFC/PATCH] AVR32: Oprofile support

On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 at 12:14 +0000, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:

> > Why not a loop here ?
> 
> The system register is coded into the instruction as an immediate, so
> it would have to be a loop with a switch in it. And with only three
> counters, I thought it looked cleaner (and faster) this way.


Acked-by: Philippe Elie <[email protected]>

-- 
Phe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC/PATCH] AVR32: Oprofile support
    • From: Haavard Skinnemoen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC/PATCH] AVR32: Oprofile support
    • From: Philippe Elie <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC/PATCH] AVR32: Oprofile support
    • From: Haavard Skinnemoen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Patch]Add strict_goal parameter to __alloc_bootmem_core
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.24-rc2 (esthetic?) regression: auto select interrupt spams my logs
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH] AVR32: Oprofile support
• Next by thread: unionfs and sys_readahead
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]