Re: [PATCH] sched: avoid large irq-latencies in smp-balancing

> On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 13:17:00 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
> +	{
> +		.ctl_name	= CTL_UNNUMBERED,
> +		.procname	= "sched_nr_migrate",
> +		.data		= &sysctl_sched_nr_migrate,
> +		.maxlen		= sizeof(unsigned int),
> +		.mode		= 644,
> +		.proc_handler	= &proc_dointvec,
> +	},

This (and all the other stuff in that table) should be described in
Documentation/, please.

It would be nice if sched_nr_migrate didn't exist, really.  It's hard to
imagine anyone wanting to tweak it, apart from developers.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: avoid large irq-latencies in smp-balancing
    • From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: avoid large irq-latencies in smp-balancing
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] sched: avoid large irq-latencies in smp-balancing
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: avoid large irq-latencies in smp-balancing
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [BUG] Linux 2.6.24-rc2 - oom-killer gets invoked
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 04/23] dentries: Extract common code to remove dentry from lru
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: avoid large irq-latencies in smp-balancing
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: avoid large irq-latencies in smp-balancing
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]