On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, Rik van Riel wrote: > How exactly can an anonymous page ever become file backed? When they get assigned a swap entry. > > Do ramfs pages count as memory backed? > > Since ramfs pages cannot be evicted from memory at all, they > should go into the "noreclaim" page set. Which LRU do they go on. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/10] define page_file_cache
- From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/10] define page_file_cache
- References:
- [RFC PATCH 0/10] split anon and file LRUs
- From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
- [RFC PATCH 3/10] define page_file_cache
- From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/10] define page_file_cache
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/10] define page_file_cache
- From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/10] define page_file_cache
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/10] define page_file_cache
- From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/10] define page_file_cache
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/10] define page_file_cache
- From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
- [RFC PATCH 0/10] split anon and file LRUs
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 00/28] cpu alloc v1: Optimize by removing arrays of pointers to per cpu objects
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] slab: fix typo in allocation failure handling
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/10] define page_file_cache
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/10] define page_file_cache
- Index(es):
 |