Re: Use of virtio device IDs

[Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>]

Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 November 2007 16:40:13 Avi Kivity wrote:
>   
> > Gregory Haskins wrote:
> >     
> > >  but FWIW: This is a major motivation for the reason that the
> > > IOQ stuff I posted a while back used strings for device identification
> > > instead of a fixed length, centrally managed namespace like PCI
> > > vendor/dev-id.  Then you can just name your device something reasonably
> > > unique (e.g. "qumranet::veth", or "ibm-pvirt-clock").
> > >       
> > I dislike strings.  They make it look as if you have a nice extensible
> > interface, where in reality you have a poorly documented interface which
> > leads to poor interoperability.
> >     
>
> Yes, you end up with exactly names like "qumranet::veth" 
> and "ibm-pvirt-clock".  I would recommend looking very hard at /proc, Open 
> Firmware on a modern system, or the Xen store, to see what a lack of 
> limitation can do to you :)
>
>   
> > We will support non-pci for s390, but in order to support Windows and
> > older Linux PCI is necessary.
> >     
>
> The aim is that PCI support is clean, but that we're not really tied to PCI.  
> I think we're getting closer with the recent config changes.
>   

Yes, my main desire was to ensure that we had a clean PCI ABI that would 
be natural to implement on a platform like Windows.  I think with the 
recent config_ops refactoring, we can now do that.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Cheers,
> Rusty.
>   

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/