Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser

On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> How should TOMOYO implement it's "match one character" in a pattern
> (used to allow or deny access in a name-based MAC)?

.. I think such a design is fundamentally bogus. You don't have 
"characters". You have "bytes".

So you either implement "match one byte", or you go crazy. It's that 
simple.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser
    • From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser
    • From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] NetLabel: Introduce a new kernel configuration API for NetLabel - For 2.6.24-rc-git11 - Smack Version 10
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]