Re: [patch 0/4] Add ARCH_SUPPORTS_KPROBES (take 2)

On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:03:45 -0400
Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]> wrote:

> take 2, using def_bool this time.

Currently, avr32 doesn't include kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation, but
defines KPROBES in arch/avr32/Kconfig.debug instead. I want to bring
avr32 in sync with everyone else, but that will obviously conflict with
this patchset.

Are these patches about to get merged or should I just send my stuff
upstream and ask you to rebase afterwards?

Håvard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 0/4] Add ARCH_SUPPORTS_KPROBES (take 2)
  - From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>

References:
- [patch 0/4] Add ARCH_SUPPORTS_KPROBES (take 2)
  - From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: mm snapshot broken-out-2007-11-06-02-32.tar.gz uploaded - build failure - rpadlpar_sysfs
Next by Date: Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386
Previous by thread: [patch 4/4] Move Kconfig.instrumentation to arch/Kconfig and init/Kconfig
Next by thread: Re: [patch 0/4] Add ARCH_SUPPORTS_KPROBES (take 2)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]