On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Theodore Tso wrote:
>
> hmm, I wonder if it would be a good idea to put together a git hook
> script that looks for things that look like git commit ID's, and if
> they aren't valid commit ID's that appear in the repository, the
> maintainer gets a warning when they do a "git am" or otherwise suck in
> a patch that was sent via e-mail...
Well, the thing is, sometimes it makes sense.
In the stable tree, for example, the commits often point to the particular
commit in the *development* tree that the particular stable commit was
cherry-picked from. And that all makes perfect sense - but such a commit
will not even exist in that tree (very much by definition: the whole point
of a stable tree is to *not* have all the development commits in that
tree, so just individual commits get moved over).
So it does make sense to point to commits in totally independent trees at
times.
Yes, it could be an option, and yes, you could probably enable/disable it
on a per-repository basis (ie the above kind of thing tens to make sense
for certain repositories but not others). But it's definitely not
something that necessarily always makes sense to do, so it's likely not a
good default (and if it's not a default, then mistakes will continue to
happen).
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
