On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 10:24:50AM +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
> It'd be very nice if the silly renamed inodes (with silly_count > 1) were moved
> to a different list in the first pass, under the inode_lock, and then waited on
> until silly_count <= 1 in a second pass only on the filtered list. This will
> provide you with O(1).
It's absolutely pointless, starting with any kind of searching for inodes,
etc. If you want fs shutdown _not_ to happen until async activity of
that kind is over, don't reinvent the sodding wheels, just tell VFS that
you are holding an active reference to superblock. End of story.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
