Re: drive side 80-wire cable detection failed

> As far as I understood it, pata_acpi should fix the problem, but I'm not 
> sure on the required configuration. Do I have to disable the normal 
> IDE-support? How 'experimental' is the PATA support?

The pata_amd (AMD/Nvidia) driver is pretty robust, but I would expect the
same results from both in your case at the moment. Tejun is still fixing
ACPI bits so after that it might be worth trying.

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • drive side 80-wire cable detection failed
    • From: Tobias Hoffmann <[email protected]>
  • Re: drive side 80-wire cable detection failed
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: drive side 80-wire cable detection failed
    • From: Tobias Hoffmann <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: device struct bloat
• Next by Date: [PATCH] ata_piix: Add additional PCI identifier for 40 wire short cable
• Previous by thread: Re: drive side 80-wire cable detection failed
• Next by thread: [PATCH] Remove unneded lock_kernel() in drivers/pci/syscall.c.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]