On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 13:42 +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 16:59:12 -0700,
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > From: Kay Sievers <[email protected]>
> >
> > Add kobj_sysfs_ops to replace subsys_sysfs_ops. There is no
> > need for special kset operations, we want to be able to use
> > simple attribute operations at any kobject, not only ksets.
> >
> > The whole concept of any default sysfs attribute operations
> > will go away with the upcoming removal of subsys_sysfs_ops.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > include/linux/kobject.h | 10 ++++++++++
> > lib/kobject.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> How about adding some simple wrappers around the new kobj_attribute
> structure? This makes the layering clearer.
> +#define KOBJ_ATTR(_name,_mode,_show,_store) \
> + struct kobj_attribute kobj_attr_##_name = \
> + __ATTR(_name,_mode,_show,_store)
That sounds fine.
> +extern int __must_check kobject_create_file(struct kobject *,
>
> struct kobj_attribute *);
> +extern void kobject_remove_file(struct kobject *,struct kobj_attribute *);
That should usually be done by default attributes assigned to the ktype.
Do you have a good use case, where people need to create such attributes
individually instead?
Kay
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]