Re: [patch] PID namespaces

On Sunday 04 November 2007 10:38, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> I.e. keep the namespace functionality but use a modulo 1.000.000 base 
> for the PIDs so that it all looks nicer to the user. Minimal visibility 
> difference but maximum compatibility. (The resulting limits are 
> reasonable: 1 million tasks per container and 4 million containers on a 
> single 32-bit box.) We could still restrict cross-namespace API use but 

4 thousand, not 4 million.
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround
    • From: Pavel Emelyanov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] PID namespaces
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] fs/dlm/: proper prototypes
• Next by Date: [PATCH] kobject: two typo fixes
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] PID namespaces
• Next by thread: Futexes and network filesystems.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]