Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> actually, one wonders if there's any value in keeping any references
> to other version control systems such as subversion, SCCS, CVS,
> mercurial, etc.
>
What do you mean by "other"? git doesn't have a monopoly, and the
kernel should support people using a reasonable set of version control
systems. Supporting VSS would be strange, but nothing wrong with the
set you listed, if people find those systems useful. It's not like it
amounts to a huge amount of effort to do so.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]