Re: [PATCH] fix i486 boot failure due to stale %ds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix i486 boot failure due to stale %ds
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 15:12:01 -0800
Cc: Mikael Pettersson <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070727)

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:


Yes, that's what the spec says.  I queried this a few months ago, but
hpa used his convincing voice and said that in practice it isn't
necessary; there are no known cpus which need this, and any that do
would cause other things to break.  But I guess now we have the
counter-example...


Yup.  I owe you a beverage :)

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [PATCH] fix i486 boot failure due to stale %ds
  - From: Mikael Pettersson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] fix i486 boot failure due to stale %ds
  - From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] fix i486 boot failure due to stale %ds
Next by Date: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486DX4
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] fix i486 boot failure due to stale %ds
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] fix i486 boot failure due to stale %ds
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux