Re: Is gcc thread-unsafe?

["Bart Van Assche" <bart.vanassche@gmail.com>]

On 11/2/07, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote:
> Bart Van Assche writes:
> > On 10/30/07, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > That's what the proposed standard language says, kinda-sorta.  There's
> > > an informal description at
> > > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2338.html.
> >
> > There is other important information in the cited text. A.o. it is
> > explained that register promotion of potentially shared variables
> > can introduce data races. Or: register promotion can introduce bugs
> > in multithreaded software when compiled with optimization
> > enabled. Are there any register promotion transformations
> > implemented in gcc that can introduce data races in multithreaded
> > software ?
>
> I expect so.  We're going to have to audit this whole enormous code
> base to find them all and take them out.
>
> Note that some of these optimizations have been around since gcc 3.4.

Has it already been decided who will do this audit, and when this
audit will happen ? Has a target date been set when this audit should
be complete, or is the completion of this audit a requirement for the
release of a specific gcc version ?

And if there would exist register promotion transformations in gcc
that can introduce data races, which would be the optimization levels
that enable these transformations ?

Bart Van Assche.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/