Re: [PATCH] Restore deterministic CPU accounting on powerpc

Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Balbir Singh writes:
> 
>> So, scaled accounting will not be available if
>> CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING is defined? Am I reading this correctly
> 
> No, what makes you think that?  If VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING=y it is the
> responsibility of the arch's account_process_tick to update the scaled
> stats.  And the powerpc version does that by calling
> account_user_time_scaled().
> 
> Paul.

I looked at the diff's and could just see the reversal of scaled
accounting. I looked at account_process_vtime(), now
account_process_tick() and things seem fine. I was mislead by the
diff.

-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] Restore deterministic CPU accounting on powerpc
    • From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Restore deterministic CPU accounting on powerpc
    • From: "Balbir Singh" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Restore deterministic CPU accounting on powerpc
    • From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser
• Next by Date: Re: Suspend to ram regression (2.6.24-rc1-git)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Restore deterministic CPU accounting on powerpc
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Restore deterministic CPU accounting on powerpc
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]