On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 18:03 +0100, Thomas Meyer wrote:
> Kay Sievers schrieb:
> > On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 00:18 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:23:21 +0200 Thomas Meyer <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I have an external hard drive with an encrypted partition. I am using
> >>> kde so all i had to do under 2.6.23 was
> >>> "cryptsetup luksOpen /dev/sdb2 crypt-extern"
> >>>
> >>> then udev/hal/kde (?)automatically created an desktop icon. i could
> >>> click this icon to mount and open the drive.
> >>>
> >>> when i do the luksOpen command with v2.6.23-6597-gcfa76f0 this icon is
> >>> not created anymore.
> >>>
> >>> a few commits were made in drivers/md, so it seems something broke.
> >>>
> >>> config extract:
> >>>
> >>> CONFIG_MD=y
> >>> # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_MD is not set
> >>> CONFIG_BLK_DEV_DM=y
> >>> # CONFIG_DM_DEBUG is not set
> >>> CONFIG_DM_CRYPT=y
> >>> CONFIG_DM_SNAPSHOT=m
> >>> CONFIG_DM_MIRROR=m
> >>> CONFIG_DM_ZERO=m
> >>> # CONFIG_DM_MULTIPATH is not set
> >>> CONFIG_DM_DELAY=m
> >>> CONFIG_DM_UEVENT=y
> >>> # CONFIG_FUSION is not set
> >>>
> >>> any ideas?
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Could be DM breakage, could be udev/sysfs breakage. Is it still happening
> >> in current mainline?
> >>
> >
> > There are no obvious changes, which I would expect to cause a breakage
> > in this area.
> >
> >> And how come I'm seeing unresponded-to-for-a-week regression
> >> reports on lkml?
> >>
> >
> > It works fine with 2.6.24-rc1+ and GNOME, even without any initial shell
> > command to set it up. Just inserting a LUKS volume, brings up a password
> > dialog, and then mounts all automatically.
> >
> > There was a timing problem fix in HAL (in 0.5.10), maybe that is what
> > happens here.
> >
> Hal version is 0.5.9.1-r2.
>
> to make things clear:
> boot 2.6.23 doing "cryptsetup luksOpen /dev/sdb2 crypt-extern" -> kde
> asks to mount new device
> boot v2.6.24-rc1-497-gb1d08ac doing "cryptsetup luksOpen /dev/sdb2
> crypt-extern" -> nothing happens in kde.
>
> same user land, different kernel.
Yeah, but I expect it to be a timing problem, which may show up with a
new kernel. The kernel is maybe just that bit faster in the event
generation, that it triggers a silly HAL bug. You probably need:
http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=hal.git;a=commit;h=f3e160d0ab85f62b76400cb521b4d1b5813d0711
It's all fine here regarding LUKS volumes, therefore I wouldn't know
what would be wrong at the kernel side.
Kay
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
