On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, David Miller wrote: > The remaining issue with accessing per-cpu areas at multiple virtual > addresses is D-cache aliasing. But that is not an issue for physicallly mapped caches. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
- From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
- Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
- References:
- [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
- From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
- Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
- From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
- Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
- From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
- Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
- From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
- [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
- Prev by Date: Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device?
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
- Index(es):
 |