On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 17:49 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > Hi, > > It looks like bdi_thresh will always be zero if filesystem does > synchronous writepage, resulting in very poor write performance. > > Hostfs (UML) is one such example, but there might be others. > > The only solution I can think of is to add a set_page_writeback(); > end_page_writeback() pair (or some reduced variant, that only does > the proportions magic). But that means auditing quite a few > filesystems... Ouch... I take it there is no other function that is shared between all these writeout paths which we could stick a bdi_writeout_inc(bdi) in?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: per-bdi-throttling: synchronous writepage doesn't work correctly
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: per-bdi-throttling: synchronous writepage doesn't work correctly
- References:
- per-bdi-throttling: synchronous writepage doesn't work correctly
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- per-bdi-throttling: synchronous writepage doesn't work correctly
- Prev by Date: Re: [BUG] [linux-pm] Commit "Hibernation: Enter platform hibernation state in a consistent way)" makes my system to resume instantly from S4
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/6] sched: make sched_slice() group scheduling savvy
- Previous by thread: per-bdi-throttling: synchronous writepage doesn't work correctly
- Next by thread: Re: per-bdi-throttling: synchronous writepage doesn't work correctly
- Index(es):