Re: 2.6.23 regression: accessing invalid mmap'ed memory from gdb causes unkillable spinning

[Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>]

On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
> Untested patch follows

Ok, this looks ok.

Except I would remove the VM_MAYSHARE bit from the test.

That whole bit should go, in fact.

We used to make it something different: iirc, a read-only SHARED mapping 
was downgraded to a non-shared mapping, because we wanted to avoid some of 
the costs we used to have with the VM implementation (actually, I think it 
was various filesystems that don't like shared mappings because they don't 
have a per-page writeback). But we left the VM_MAYSHARE bit on, to get 
/proc/<pid>/mmap things right.

Or something like that. I forget the details. But I *think* we don't 
actually need this any more.

But basically, the "right" way to test for shared mappings is historically 
to just test the VM_MAYSHARE bit - but not *both* bits. Because VM_SHARE 
may have been artificially cleared.

Somebody should double-check my memory.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/