On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 07:07 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 11:50 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > A few random patches that permit POWER to pass kernbench on -rt.
> > Many of these have more focus on expediency than care for correctness,
> > so might best be thought of as workarounds than as complete solutions.
> > There are still issues not addressed by this patch, including:
> >
> > o kmem_cache_alloc() from non-preemptible context during
> > bootup (xics_startup() building the irq_radix_revmap()).
> >
> > o unmap_vmas() freeing pages with preemption disabled.
> > Might be able to address this by linking the pages together,
> > then freeing them en masse after preemption has been re-enabled,
> > but there is likely a better approach.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> I see a lot of case where you add preempt_disable/enable around areas
> that have the PTE lock held...
>
> So in -rt, spin_lock doesn't disable preempt ? I'm a bit worried...
So as Paul mentioned, spin_lock is now a mutex. There is a new
raw_spinlock however (simply change the way it is declared, calling
conventions are the same) which is used in a very few areas where a
traditional spin_lock is truly necessary. This may or may not be one of
those times, but I wanted to point it out.
--Darren
> there are some strong requirements that anything within that lock is not
> preempted, so zap_pte_ranges() is the obvious ones but all of them would
> need to be addressed.
>
> Ben.
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
