On Wednesday 31 October 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:33, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > > Is it valid to send events from within ->resume device method? > > It is or at least it should be. The GPEs are supposed to be fully > functional at this point. > > > If not, what is the proper way to notify user space about hardware > > changes during suspension? > > Specifically it seems that new sysfs ACPI power supply interface > > sometimes missing plugged in AC cord during suspend. I suspect that no > > event is generated for this; I am not sure whether ACPI is required to > > generate such events at all in this case. > > > > I'll need some time to get reproducible case so I do not categorize this > > yet as regression. > > Is the "[2.6.24-rc1 regression] AC adapter state does not change after > resume" message a follow-up to this one? > yes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- References:
- 2.6.24: (ACPI AC adapter) sending {proc,netlink,kobject}_event from -> resume method?
- From: Andrey Borzenkov <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.24: (ACPI AC adapter) sending {proc,netlink,kobject}_event from -> resume method?
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- 2.6.24: (ACPI AC adapter) sending {proc,netlink,kobject}_event from -> resume method?
- Prev by Date: Re: [2.6.24-rc1 regression] AC adapter state does not change after resume
- Next by Date: [PATCH]: exit_ivtv_i2c() cannot be __devexit
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.24: (ACPI AC adapter) sending {proc,netlink,kobject}_event from -> resume method?
- Next by thread: [PATCH v3] 0/4 fs/ioctl.c coding style, function renaming/factoring
- Index(es):
 |