Re: [dm-devel] Re: dm: bounce_pfn limit added

On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 02:01:33AM +0000, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> What if you swap in alternative dm targets, e.g. if it's linear,
> try multipath (round-robin, one path)?
  
And try using md instead of dm - does that also show the problem?
(md takes a similar stance to dm on this I believe.)

Alasdair
-- 
[email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • dm: bounce_pfn limit added
    • From: Vasily Averin <[email protected]>
  • Re: dm: bounce_pfn limit added
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [dm-devel] Re: dm: bounce_pfn limit added
    • From: Alasdair G Kergon <[email protected]>
  • Re: [dm-devel] Re: dm: bounce_pfn limit added
    • From: Alasdair G Kergon <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: fix marker warnings
• Next by Date: Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
• Previous by thread: Re: [dm-devel] Re: dm: bounce_pfn limit added
• Next by thread: Re: [dm-devel] Re: dm: bounce_pfn limit added
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]