Re: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Paul Jackson wrote:

> But in any case, we (the kernel) are just providing the mechanisms.
> If they don't fit ones needs, don't use them ;).
> 

The kernel is providing the mechanism to interleave over a set of nodes or 
prefer a single node for allocations, but it also provides for remapping 
those to different nodes, without regard to locality or affinity to 
specific hardware, when the cpuset changes.  That's what Choice C is 
intended to replace: a node means a node so either you get an effected 
mempolicy over the nodemask you asked for, or MPOL_DEFAULT is used because 
you lack sufficient access.

		David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux