On Tuesday 30 October 2007, David Brownell wrote:
> >
> > was there something that caught your eye other than the ugly udelay()
> > you mentioned in the other thread ?
>
> That one was a feature that might be more generally necessary,
> just to meet chip timing specs. Mostly they're no trouble.
>
... although I note that the referenced thread suggested maybe
the problem there was a missing pullup on the chipselect line. If
that was really the cause, then I think that feature would best
be left out of the framework. :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]