Re: [patch 07/10] SLUB: Avoid referencing kmem_cache structure in __slab_alloc

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 20:32:03 -0700
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:

> There is the need to use the objects per slab in the first part of
> __slab_alloc() which is still pretty hot. Copy the number of objects
> per slab into the kmem_cache_cpu structure. That way we can get the
> value from a cache line that we already need to touch. This brings
> the kmem_cache_cpu structure up to 4 even words.
> 
> There is no increase in the size of kmem_cache_cpu since the size of object
> is rounded to the next word.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
> 
> ---
>  include/linux/slub_def.h |    1 +
>  mm/slub.c                |    3 ++-
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/slub_def.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/slub_def.h	2007-10-26 19:09:16.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/slub_def.h	2007-10-27 07:55:12.000000000 -0700
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ struct kmem_cache_cpu {
>  	int node;
>  	unsigned int offset;
>  	unsigned int objsize;
> +	unsigned int objects;
>  };

mutter.  nr_objects would be a better name, but then one should rename
kmem_cache.objects too.

Better would be to comment the field.  Please devote extra care to commenting
data structures.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/