Re: [Linux-am33-list] [PATCH 0/2] MN10300: Add the MN10300 architecture to Linux kernel [try #2]

On 10/29/07, David Howells <[email protected]> wrote:
> The second patch adds the architecture itself, to be selected by ARCH=mn10300
> on the make command line.

Why don't you use `am33' for the arch name?
Do you have any plans to support am30 (mn10300) or any pre-am33 processor cores?

I know the mn10300-* target configurations are also available for toolchains,
but it is for historical reasons.
Even the GNUPro packages have the release name am33-04r2-5 instead of mn10300-*.

The same arch name would be better for the same architecture
among the toolchains, the kernel and the library, not to confuse contributors.
GNU libc has used am33 for the machine name since the architecture was
supported.


-- 
Suzuki Takashi
Japan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/2] MN10300: Add the MN10300 architecture to Linux kernel [try #2]
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: vm_ops.page_mkwrite() fails with vmalloc on 2.6.23
• Next by Date: Re: [GIT PATCH] final SCSI pieces for the merge window
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 1/2] MN10300: Suppress AOUT library support in ELF binfmt if !CONFIG_BINFMT_AOUT [try #2]
• Next by thread: Re: [Linux-am33-list] [PATCH 0/2] MN10300: Add the MN10300 architecture to Linux kernel [try #2]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]