* Ian Pratt <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Sigh, I don't really want to have this fight again.
> >
> > i dont remember us having discussed this before, ever. If there's any
> > "fight" about monotonicity and SMP then it would be a pretty onesided
> > affair, with you being beaten up seriously ;-)
>
> Actually, it is possible, even for NUMA systems with CPUs running off
> completely different oscillators, and in the presence of CPU frequency
> changes, power management, and even in the presence of thermal
> throttling (though the latter introduces temporary inaccuracies it
> doesn't affect monotonicity or rate).
>
> Take a look at the Xen code to see how each physical CPU is
> independently calibrated on an ongoing basis, how movement of VCPUs
> between physical CPUs is tracked, and how shared variables are used to
> ensure montonicity if a guest requires it.
I think that's wishful thinking. Check out:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/time-warp-test/time-warp-test.c
change TEST_TSC to 0, run it on an SMP guest (on a reasonably fast
machine) and let me know whether you can make SMP guests not come up
with monotonicity violations in the CLOCK tests.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
