Re: [PATCH] raise tsc clocksource rating

* Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:

> > Since it's being a tendency among paravirt clocksources to use 
> > values around 400, we should declare tsc as even better: So we use 
> > 500.
> > 
> > This patch also touches the comments on clocksource.h, which 
> > suggests that 499 would be a limit on the rating values.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]>
> 
> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] raise tsc clocksource rating
    • From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] raise tsc clocksource rating
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [bug, 2.6.24-rc1] sysfs: duplicate filename 'eth0' can not be created
• Next by Date: Re: [BUG] [linux-pm] Commit "Hibernation: Enter platform hibernation state in a consistent way)" makes my system to resume instantly from S4
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] raise tsc clocksource rating
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] raise tsc clocksource rating
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]