Re: [PATCH] pidns: Place under CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL (take 2)

Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]> writes:

> Can you please send namespace related patches to containers@ ML first
> before sending them to Linus/Andrew?

If you are so anxious to review my patches can you please review them?
I'd love to see an acked-by or an actual bug found.

I only did what I always do when I am focusing on fixing a bug
in the stable kernel.  I fix the bug if I can with a simple obviously
correct patch and send that patch off to the maintainer.  Copying
other people that I know of who have a chance of reviewing the
patch.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] pidns: Place under CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL (take 2)
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
  • Re: [PATCH] pidns: Place under CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL (take 2)
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2 ] Add support LZO in mkcramfs tool
• Next by Date: RE: epoll design problems with common fork/exec patterns
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] pidns: Place under CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL (take 2)
• Next by thread: [x86 setup] Unbreak booting with Loadlin and old LILO
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]