Am Montag, 29. Oktober 2007 schrieb Arjan van de Ven: > On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:02:43 -0700 > Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > And 2.6.23 was OK? > > > > Is this problem still present in Linus's current tree? > > and did you enable the "ignore nice levels" switch in sysfs ondemand > directory? > Oh no, if you mean /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/ondemand/ignore_nice_load I didn't changed anything, instead I just used the same .config file, rebooted into the new kernel and ran the test again. -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- References:
- cpu governor ondemand issue
- From: Toralf Förster <[email protected]>
- Re: cpu governor ondemand issue
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: cpu governor ondemand issue
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- cpu governor ondemand issue
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] UML - Fix incompatible types warning in previous SG fix
- Next by Date: [PATCH] FRV: Permit the memory to be located elsewhere in NOMMU mode [try #2]
- Previous by thread: Re: cpu governor ondemand issue
- Next by thread: [patch 1/2] oProfile: oops when profile_pc() return ~0LU
- Index(es):
 |