On Oct 26, 2007, at 4:42 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Oct 25, 2007, at 12:59 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
Could you please try the following patch?
Cheers
Trond
--------------------------------- CUT HERE
-----------------------------
From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:56:10 -0400
NFS: Fix the ustat() regression
Since 2.6.18, the superblock sb->s_root has been a dummy dentry
with a
dummy inode. This breaks ustat(), which actually uses sb->s_root in a
vfstat() call.
Fix this by making the s_root a dummy alias to the directory inode
that was
used when creating the superblock.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
---
fs/nfs/getroot.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++
+------------------------------------
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
Any reason not to send this to Linus as a bug fix for 2.6.24 (and
possibly stable)?
ping. would love to see this is Linus's tree.
- k
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]