Am Montag, 29. Oktober 2007 schrieb Andrew Morton: > On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:16:14 +0200 Toralf Förster <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I use the following one liner for regression tests of the cpufreq governor and > > friends: > > > > tfoerste@n22 ~ $ time factor 819734028463158891 > > > > which usually needs 5.5 secs to complete at 1.7 GHz of my pentium M processor. > > > > With the current git sources (commit cfa76f0 at Sat Oct 20 20:19:15 2007 -0700) > > instead this command needs 3 times longer if I run the "distributed.net client" > > as a background process with nice level 19 b/c the cpu frequency still stays > > at 600 MHz. > > After stopping dnetc the cpu frequency governor ondemand works as expected again. > > > > Tested at my ThinkPad T41 with stable Gentoo: > > > > tfoerste@n22 ~ $ grep -e ^CONFIG_ACPI -e ^CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ ~/devel/linux-2.6/.config > > CONFIG_ACPI=y > > CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=y > > CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS=y > > CONFIG_ACPI_PROC_EVENT=y > > CONFIG_ACPI_AC=m > > CONFIG_ACPI_BATTERY=m > > CONFIG_ACPI_BUTTON=m > > CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=m > > CONFIG_ACPI_FAN=m > > CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=m > > CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL=m > > CONFIG_ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR=0 > > CONFIG_ACPI_EC=y > > CONFIG_ACPI_POWER=y > > CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM=y > > CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_PERFORMANCE=y > > CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_POWERSAVE=m > > CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND=y > > > > And 2.6.23 was OK? > > Is this problem still present in Linus's current tree? > > Thanks. > Hello, with -rc1 the problem went away :-) -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- References:
- cpu governor ondemand issue
- From: Toralf Förster <[email protected]>
- Re: cpu governor ondemand issue
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- cpu governor ondemand issue
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.24-rc1: First impressions
- Next by Date: Re: Abit F-190HD Onboard rlt8169 Ethernet Controller
- Previous by thread: Re: cpu governor ondemand issue
- Next by thread: Re: cpu governor ondemand issue
- Index(es):