Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Roughly that sounds like CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL to me. But I would
> be happy to hear if someone has a better idea.
>
Rather than overload an existing config option, why not add one with the
specific semantics you want: CONFIG_UNSTABLE_UABI. The problem seems
like one which which may occur again, though one hopes not too often. I
guess the risk is that people will leave their subsystems depending on
it permanently (sysfs?), so it ends up being set all the time and
becomes as useless as EXPERIMENTAL...
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
