Re: [patch 02/10] SLUB: Noinline some functions to avoid them being folded into alloc/free

On Sat, 27 Oct 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Some function tend to get folded into __slab_free and __slab_alloc
> although they are rarely called. They cause register pressure that
> leads to bad code generation.

Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch 00/10] SLUB: SMP regression tests on Dual Xeon E5345 (8p) and new performance patches
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • [patch 02/10] SLUB: Noinline some functions to avoid them being folded into alloc/free
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 01/10] SLUB: Consolidate add_partial and add_partial_tail to one function
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 03/10] SLUB: Move kmem_cache_node determination into add_full and add_partial
• Previous by thread: [patch 02/10] SLUB: Noinline some functions to avoid them being folded into alloc/free
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 02/10] SLUB: Noinline some functions to avoid them being folded into alloc/free
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]