Re: [linux-pm] QUESTION: How to fix race between .suspend routine and watchdog timer

[Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>]

On Saturday 27 October 2007 21:17:55 Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> 
> > > > Looking through the dmfe code, I noticed yet another possible race.
> > > > A race between the .suspend, and a timer that serves both as a watchdog, and link state detector.
> > > > Again I need to prevent it from running during the suspend/resume, but how?
> > > > 
> > > > I can use del_timer in .suspend, and mod_timer in .resume, but that doesn't protect against
> > > > race with already running timer.
> > > > I can use del_timer_sync, but it states that it is useless if timer re-enables itself, and I agree with that.
> > > > In dmfe case the timer does re-enable itself.
> > > 
> > > That comment isn't right.  del_timer_sync works perfectly well even if
> > > the timer routine re-enables itself, provided it stops doing so after a
> > > small number of iterations.
> > Thanks for the info. but....
> > Due to the "don't access the hardware, while powered-off" rule, I must know that the timer isn't running.
> > and won't be.
> > So what function to use (if possible) to be sure that the timer won't run anymore?
> > (Taking in the account the fact that it re-enables itself)
> 
> Use del_timer_sync().  It guarantees that when it returns, the timer 
> will be stopped and the timer routine will no longer be running on any 
> CPU.
> 
Even if the timer re-enables itself, are you sure?

> Alan Stern
> 
> 

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/