Re: eradicating out of tree modules

Tilman Schmidt wrote about:
> breaking interfaces they rely on for no other "very good
> reason" than to discourage out-of-tree development?

How often did this happen yet?
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== =-=- ==-==
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
  • Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface
    • From: "Simon Arlott" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
    • From: Simon Arlott <[email protected]>
  • Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
    • From: Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
  • Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
    • From: Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
  • Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • eradicating out of tree modules (was: : Linux Security *Module* Framework)
    • From: Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH v2] [POWERPC] Fix CONFIG_SMP=n build break
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option
• Previous by thread: eradicating out of tree modules (was: : Linux Security *Module* Framework)
• Next by thread: Re: eradicating out of tree modules (was: : Linux Security *Module* Framework)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]