Re: [PATCH 1/2] MN10300: Permit AOUT library support to be suppressed in ELF binfmt

Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:

> hm, seems a bit ungainly.  Why can't we just make all the aout things in
> binfmt_elf.c depend upon CONFIG_BINFMT_AOUT?

That works too, I guess.  I'll change it.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] MN10300: Permit AOUT library support to be suppressed in ELF binfmt
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 0/2] MN10300: Add the MN10300 architecture to Linux kernel
  - From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/2] MN10300: Permit AOUT library support to be suppressed in ELF binfmt
  - From: David Howells <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [AppArmor 00/45] AppArmor security module overview
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix bad data from non-direct-io read after direct-io write
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] MN10300: Permit AOUT library support to be suppressed in ELF binfmt
Next by thread: Regression: commit "ide: constify struct ide_port_info" causes breakage
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]