On Friday 26 October 2007 13:30, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> There's a slight problem (other than HCH not liking it) with this
> approach of passing the open file in iattr: for special files, the
> struct file pointer makes no sense to the filesystem, since it is always
> opened by the generic functions.
So what do you think where the inodes come from for syscalls like fchmod? Out
of struct file, of course. But your f_op->getattr and f_op->setattr patches
are meant for passing struct file down to filesystems anyway, so that
completely contradicts what you are saying above.
> So I think the correct solution (which was suggested by Trond and
> others) is to define an f_op->fsetattr() method, which interested
> filesystems can define.
That's nothing but a replacement for ATTR_FILE and iattr->ia_file. Except by
removing the ATTR_FILE flag, LSMs will no longer get that information for
distinguishing file descriptor operations from other operations.
AppArmor needs to know when notify_change is called on a file descriptor, but
it doesn't care about the file descriptor itself. So any way of passing along
that information will be fine.
Thanks,
Andreas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]